In December 2025, a team of materials scientists published a study testing a new fire-protective coating on two very different things: structural steel, and lithium-ion battery cells. The coating’s active ingredient was ammonium polyphosphate — a compound that, under heat, decomposes and reacts to form an expanding, insulating char layer. It worked: a 1.5-millimeter coating kept steel below 150°C during a 20-minute, 1,100°C torch test, and separately reduced thermal runaway propagation between battery cells.
What the paper didn’t mention is that ammonium polyphosphate has been the active ingredient in wildland firefighting retardant — the pink and red stuff dropped from air tankers — for over sixty years. Two industries are now converging on the same core chemistry from opposite directions: one just discovering it works on batteries, the other having spent six decades learning, sometimes the hard way, exactly how to make it work reliably, cheaply, and safely at scale.
Scientific Foundation
Long-term wildland fire retardants, marketed under names like PHOS-CHEK, work by coating fuel with retardant salts — typically ammonium polyphosphate-based fertilizers — that react with cellulose to form a protective char layer, slowing combustion even after the water carrying the retardant has evaporated. The U.S. Forest Service has spent decades refining and regulating this chemistry: it maintains formal specifications capping how corrosive retardant concentrate can be to aluminum, steel, brass, and magnesium, requires ecological risk assessments covering aquatic and terrestrial species, and has pushed manufacturers toward less environmentally persistent formulations, including magnesium sulfate-based alternatives with added corrosion inhibitors.
Meanwhile, grid-scale battery storage has a fire problem of its own and no comparably mature playbook. A 2025 review in the Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries notes that 90 fire and explosion incidents were recorded at energy storage facilities worldwide between 2017 and 2024. Thermal runaway in lithium-ion cells is especially hard to fight because the reaction is internally fueled — a cell doesn’t need external oxygen to keep burning, and can push neighboring cells past 600°C within seconds, propagating through a module in a cascading chain reaction. Standard water suppression struggles because of electrical conductivity concerns, prompting research into alternatives like silica-encapsulated “dry water” droplets and phase-change thermal storage materials that passively absorb heat.
Ammonium polyphosphate-based intumescent coatings — chemically close cousins of wildland retardant — have already entered this fight. Beyond the December 2025 steel-and-battery study, a 2026 MRS Bulletin overview specifically discusses intumescent coatings and fire blankets as passive protection against thermal runaway propagation in multicell lithium-ion batteries, and separate materials research has combined ammonium polyphosphate with talc to build ceramic-forming barrier layers explicitly aimed at battery module encapsulation.
Cross-Domain Connection
So the chemistry has already crossed over — but the engineering maturity hasn’t. Wildland retardant research solved, through decades of expensive field trial and regulatory iteration, a set of practical problems that battery-coating researchers are now encountering for the first time in the lab: how to keep an ammonium-phosphate formulation from corroding the metal it’s applied near, how to make it stable enough to sit unused for months or years without degrading (retardant bases are stockpiled at airtanker bases year-round), how to balance fire performance against cost and toxicity at industrial scale, and how to formulate it so it clings uniformly to a surface rather than running off.
Grid battery enclosures are, not coincidentally, metal boxes that need long-term chemical stability and corrosion resistance — almost exactly the constraints the Forest Service has spent decades writing formal specifications around for aircraft tanks and ground equipment. Rather than battery-safety researchers rediscovering corrosion-inhibitor chemistry and long-term storage stability from scratch, cell-by-cell, there’s an underused opportunity to directly import USFS-vetted formulation science — corrosion inhibitor packages, aqueous mixing behavior, environmental toxicity screening protocols — into battery intumescent coating design, treating wildland retardant less as an unrelated industry and more as a shortcut through problems it already paid to solve.
What Remains Undemonstrated
It would be inaccurate to present this as an unexplored connection at the chemistry level — it isn’t. Ammonium polyphosphate intumescent coatings are already an active battery-safety research area, with published results showing real thermal runaway propagation reduction. What hasn’t been demonstrated is the specific, deliberate transfer of wildland retardant’s applied engineering knowledge — its corrosion-inhibitor formulations, its long-term storage-stability data, its cost and toxicity optimization built for aviation-scale deployment — into that battery research pipeline. The papers testing APP coatings on batteries don’t reference Forest Service retardant specifications or corrosion-inhibitor patents; they’re largely re-deriving formulation choices independently.
It’s also unproven that a formulation optimized for coating tree canopies and brush at ambient outdoor conditions would perform identically against the much higher, faster-onset temperatures and internally-fueled combustion of a battery thermal event; the fire regimes are chemically related but not identical, and nobody has published a head-to-head test of USFS-spec retardant chemistry against dedicated battery intumescent coatings under UL 9540A-style propagation testing, the industry’s current standard method, updated in March 2026.
Why It Matters
Battery safety standards are evolving fast — UL 9540A’s sixth edition and the new ISO 3941:2026 “Class L” fire classification both reflect an industry racing to catch up with a fire behavior it doesn’t yet have decades of field experience managing, the way wildland firefighting does. Cross-pollinating mature, already-regulated retardant engineering into that newer field could shorten the distance between “shows promise in a cone calorimeter” and “certified, deployable, corrosion-safe product for a battery storage facility” — without requiring anyone to invent new base chemistry, just apply old lessons to a new container.
The Human Dimension
There’s a particular kind of institutional memory sitting in Forest Service corrosion specifications and sixty years of tanker-base storage logs — mundane, unglamorous knowledge about how a phosphate salt behaves in a steel tank in July heat, accumulated one incident and one revised spec at a time. It’s easy for that kind of knowledge to stay siloed in its original industry simply because nobody building grid batteries thought to ask the wildland firefighting world what it already knew. Sometimes the most useful research isn’t a new discovery — it’s just a phone call between two industries that happen to be independently solving the same chemistry problem.
Sources:
1. “Wildland Fire Safety,” Perimeter Solutions (PHOS-CHEK / FIRE-TROL): https://www.perimeter-solutions.com/en/wildland-fire-safety/
2. “Long-term fire retardant with corrosion inhibitors and methods for making and using same,” USPTO patent filing: https://image-ppubs.uspto.gov/dirsearch-public/print/downloadPdf/12214236
3. “Interagency Wildland Fire Chemicals Policy and Guidance,” US Forest Service: https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/fire/chemicals
4. “Metals in Wildfire Suppressants,” Environmental Science & Technology Letters: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.estlett.4c00727
5. “A versatile eco-friendly intumescent coating imparts excellent fire protective performance for steel structures and batteries,” ScienceDirect: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0300944025007994
6. “Overview of anti-fire technology for suppressing thermal runaway of lithium battery,” ScienceDirect: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378775325006032
7. “Fire blanket and intumescent coating materials for failure resistance,” MRS Bulletin: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1557/s43577-021-00102-7
8. “Thermal energy storage materials for suppressing thermal runaway propagation in lithium-ion batteries: a review,” EES Batteries (RSC): https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2026/eb/d5eb00243e
Idea originated at artificialideas.org. Article researched and written by Claude Sonnet 5. Published at artificialideas.
Artificial Ideas 